SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Raj) 233

A.K.PARIHAR
Dainik Navjyoti – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anant Kasliwal, for the Appellant

Judgment

R.R. Yadav, J.-Indisputably, the petitioner’s real grievance is confined to Annexure-6 assessment order passed by Assessing Authority under Section 11 of Rajasthan Lands & Buildings Tax act, 1964 against which he has filed an appeal before Respondent No. 3 --the Director (Appellate Authority) under Section l6of the Rajasthan Lands & Buildings Tax Act, 1964, which reads thus:-

“(l) Any person aggrieved by an order under Sections 10, 11 (13, 15 or 15B) may at any time before the expiry of thirty days from the date of the order, prefer an appeal to the Collector of the District, where the (land and building) in respect of which the order was passed, is situate or to such other authority as the State Government, may by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint in this behalf : Provided that no appeal shall be entertained unless it is accompanied by satisfactory proof of payment of whole of the tax assessed).”

2. After filing of the appeal, the Respondent No. 3 issued a notice Anncxure-8 to the petitioner to make compliance of proviso of Sub-section (1) of Section 16 of the Rajasthan Lands and Buildings Tax Act, 1964. The petitioner instead of making compliance of Annexure-8








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top