Arun Madan, J.-This first appeal is directed against the Judgment and Decree dated 30-10-92 of the District Judge, Bharatpur in Civil Suit No. 58/88 for recovery of Rs. 25,000/-as damages formalicious prosecution which was dismissed.

.2. The facts leading to this appeal, briefly stated are that plaintiff appellant instituted a suit for damages for malicious prosecution launched in a criminal case arising out of FIR No. 466/86 lodged by defendant at Police Station Kotwali (Bharatpur) on 22-9-86 for offence punishable under Section 435, IPC. The case of the plaintiff as per the plaint is that aforesaid FIR was totally false because the defendant had pressurised upon the police

.by adducing false evidence which resulted in filing of challan against the plaintiff for offence under Section 435, IPC and for which he had to apply for anticipatory bail twice before the trial Court and once before the High Court and whereupon he had incurred expenses for advocates fees, and the launching of such false prosecution by the defendant culminated into acquittal in his favour by Judgment dated 26-11-87 in Sessions Case No. 26/87. The plaintiff therefore pleaded that his acquittal is the o