B.S. Chauhan, J.-Instant writ petition has been filed against the Judgment and order dated 21st Jun, 1985 (Annexure 3) whereby learned Board of Revenue accepted second appeal of the contesting respondents and reversed the Judgment and order of the Revenue Appellate Authority dated 13-12-1983 (Annexure 2) by which it has affirmed the Judgment and decree of dismissal of suit passed by the trial Court dated 30-5-1983 (Anex. 1).

2. The facts and circumstances giving rise to this case arc that petitioners filed a suit for declaration and possession in the Civil Court against contesting respondents but the Civil Court rejected the said plaint, holding that it had no jurisdiction and plaint was presented subsequently in the Court of Assistant Collector Hanumangarh. Petitioners had alleged in the plaint that after purchasing land in dispute, they had appointed one Roop Ram (Respondent No. 6) as Special Power-of-Attorney for the purpose of managing the land and depositing of instalments etc. on 16-8-1967. in spite of the fact that said power-of-attorney was terminated vide registered notice dated 22-12-1969, Respondent No. 6 executed the said deed of the land in dispute in favour o