SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Raj) 360

MOHD.YAMIN
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Nagji – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.D. Kalla, Public Prosecutor, for the Appellant
K.K. Shah, for the Respondents

Judgment

Mohd. Yamin, J.-Nagji was prosecuted before Judicial Magistrate, Sarada District Udaipur for offence under Sections 2 1/25 of the Arms Act and has been acquitted, therefore, this leave to appeal. A notice was issued to the accused-respondent who has appeared through his Counsel.

2. I have heard learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned Counsel for the respondent.

3. Briefly stated, it is alleged that on 16-11-1998 accused-respondent was found possessing a muzzle loaded gun, licence of which had expired on 31-12-1996. Bherulal A.S.I. had gone on patrolling duty along with Shanti Lal Head Constable. When they reached in village Sarada accused is said to have been seen carrying a muzzle loaded gun. He was stopped and enquired as to whether he had any licence. The accused-respondent stated that the licence was lying at his residence. The same was obtained. The licence bearing No. 158/90 was valid only up to 31-12-1996. He did not deposit the arm at the police station after expiry of the licence, therefore, the arm was seized. A case under Section 2 1/25 of the Arms Act was registered and ultimately the accused was challaned. Plea of the accused respondent was recorded under






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top