SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Raj) 760

ARUN MADAN
Jagdish Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Prakash Chand Jain, for the Appellant
Mr. M.M. Ranjan, for the Respondents

Judgment

Arun Madan, J.-The petitioner has challenged the impugned sentence on the ground only confined to its inadequacy in this revision petition, Under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. praying therein for awarding deterrent sentence to the respondent (accused) Sangram Singh, who was convicted Under Sections. 457, 458, 323 & 324 IPC but sentenced to undergo four months simple imprisonment under each count and was imposed with fine of Rs. 200/-each Under Section 457 & -158 IPC, by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bandikui(District Dausa)under Judgment dated 7.96 in Criminal Case No. 215/96 arising out of FIR No. 173/95 lodged on 8.5.1995 at Police Station Bandikui by complainant (petitioner) herein. The accused-respondent Sangram Singh who at the time of incident was duly armed with axe is alleged to have intruded into complainant’s house at about 1 O’clock in the midnight thereof , whereupon his mother and sister who were sleeping in the chowk got awaken, and respondent Sangram Singh inflicted axe blows upon them. (2). After usual investigation the police submitted challan and the respondent was charged for offence punishable Under Section 457, 458, 323



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top