SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Raj) 9

ARUN MADAN
Rajesh Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Madhav Mitra, for the Appellant
M.L. Goyal, Public Prosecutor for the Respondents

Judgment

Arun Madan, J.-This revision petition has been preferred before this Court against the order dated 21-8-97 passed by the learned Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Alwar by which, the petitioner has been charged for the commission of offences under Sections 120-B, 328, 376, 506, 385, 409 and 420,I.P.C. in Sessions Case No. 41/97 on the basis of the FIR No. 328/96 registered with Police Station Kotwali, Alwar.

2. Thefacts which are relevant for deciding this revision petition briefly stated are that an FIR was lodged with Police Station Kotwali, Alwar by the prosecutrix Mst. Rachna Gupta on 17-6-96 with an allegation that she was appointed as a Teacher in the school owned and managed by the petitioner Rajesh Sharma. On the closure of the school by the management, it had resulted in discontinuation of the services of the prosecutrix. Smt. Shalini Sharma wife of the petitioner who was at the relevant time presiding as chair-person of a registered society namely Navodaya Samaj Kalyan Samiti and who was subsequently appointed as Vice-President of Rajasthan Samaj Kalyan Advisory Board, Jaipur for the reason that she could not spare time to look after the abovenam












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top