SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Raj) 809

BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE
Nathia – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sanjay Mathur, for the Appellant
Chandralekha, Public Prosecutor for the Respondents

Judgment

V.G. Palshikar, J.-This appeal is directed that against the Judgment dt. 1-9-92 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Udaipur in Criminal Case No. 1791 convicting the appellant-accused of offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to imprisonment for life.

2. Theprosecution story stated briefly is that at about 1.30 p.m. on 24th October, 1990, first information report was lodged in Police Station, Parsola to the effect that one Paduri aged about 55 years has been killed by the accused as he wanted to take up the land belonging to Paduri who was a childless woman. It was alleged in the first information report that one Nathia sb Chokha Meena has killed Paduri and this information was given to Kesia who lodged the first information report by Kalu S/o Roopa who directed to lodge the information with the Police. On the basis of this report, investigation was taken up and on completion of investigation, the accused was prosecuted as aforesaid and convicted by the impugned Judgment . The learned counsel for the appellant has contended that the Judgment of conviction is unsustainable in law. According to the learned counsel, only one person was named

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top