SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Raj) 698

V.S.KOKJE, A.K.SINGH
Hasmat Tara – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L. Purohit, for the Appellant
L.R. Mehta and M.R. Singhvi, for the Respondents.

Judgment

V.S. Kokje, ACJ.-All these appeals arise out of a common order and arise out of the same suit and, therefore, they were heard together and are being decided together.

2. Theland in question earlier belonged to one Shri Munir Khan who was original holder of the land. He died in the year 1940. His nephews Fajlu Khan and Hafij Khan succeeded to the estate according to one party and according to the other party only Hafij Khan succeeded to the estate of Munir Khan. M/s. J. K. White Cement Works purchased the land in question from sons of Hafij Khan alone. When they tried to enter possession, successors of Fajlu Khan objected and filed the suit and prayed for temporary injunction therein for protecting their possession. Daughters of Hafij Khan were also impleaded in this suit. On 12-2-96 a temporary injunction was issued at the instance of the successors of Fajlu Khan as well as three daughters of Hafij Khan. Four appeals were filed against the injunction order, all of them were dismissed. The matter went to the Board of Revenue in its revisional jurisdiction and the Board of Revenue partly allowed the revision applications and vacated the injunction and instead asked for a sec















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top