SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Raj) 698

High Court Of Rajasthan
Judgename : V.S. Kokje,A.K. Singh
Hasmat Tara - Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue - Respondent
Civil Special Appeal Nos. 1030 of 1997
Decided On : 10/16/1998

Advocates Appeared:
B.L. Purohit, for the Appellant
L.R. Mehta and M.R. Singhvi, for the Respondents.

The right to all mines, minerals and quarries vests in the State Govt. and the State Govt. shall have all powers necessary for the enjoyment of such a right. The assignee of the State Govt. cannot enter the land without tendering the compensation determined under Section 89(4) unless previous sanction of the Collector is obtained by it.

Headnote:

MINING RIGHTS - RIGHT TO MINERALS, MINES, QUARRIES AND FISHERIES - RIGHT TO ALL MINES AND QUARRIES INCLUDES RIGHT OF ACCESS TO LAND FOR MINING AND QUARRYING - RIGHT TO OCCUPY SUCH OTHER LAND AS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR PURPOSES SUBSIDIARY THERETO - COMPENSATION FOR INFRINGEMENT OF RIGHT OF OCCUPATION AND DISTURBANCE OF SUCCESSORS OF THE LANDS - DETERMINATION OF COMPENSATION BY COLLECTOR OR CIVIL COURT - PREVIOUS SANCTION OF COLLECTOR REQUIRED TO ENTER ON OR OCCUPY SURFACE OF LAND - RAJASTHAN LAND REVENUE ACT, 1956, SECTION 89.

Fact of the Case:

M/s. J. K. White Cement Works purchased land from the sons of Hafij Khan, one of the nephews of the original holder of the land, Munir Khan. When they tried to enter possession, successors of Fajlu Khan, the other nephew of Munir Khan, objected and filed a suit for temporary injunction to protect their possession. The trial court granted the injunction, which was upheld by the appellate court. The Board of Revenue partly allowed the revision applications and vacated the injunction, instead asking for a security of Rs. 50,00,000/- from J. K. White Cement Works. The single judge set aside the orders of the Board of Revenue and the Sub-Divisional Officer and directed that M/s. J. K. White Cement should approach the Collector for determination of compensation under Sub-section (4) of Section 89 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that in view of the provisions of Section 89 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956, there can be no case for issue of a temporary injunction against excavation of minerals from a revenue paying land under a licence granted by the State Govt. The court further held that the assignee of the State Govt. cannot enter the land without tendering the compensation determined under Section 89(4) unless previous sanction of the Collector is obtained by it.

Issues: Whether a temporary injunction can be issued against excavation of minerals from a revenue paying land under a licence granted by the State Govt.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that Section 89 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956, vests the right to all mines, minerals and quarries in the State Govt. and provides for the determination of compensation to the holders of the land for infringement of their rights by the occupation or disturbance of the surface of such land. The court further held that the assignee of the State Govt. cannot enter the land without tendering the compensation determined under Section 89(4) unless previous sanction of the Collector is obtained by it.

Final Decision: The court disposed of the appeals by substituting the following directions in place of the directions contained in the impugned order: M/s. J. K. White Cement Works, the assignee of the mining rights may approach the Collector if they have not already so approached for sanction under Sub-section (5) of Section 89 to enter on or occupy the surface of the land in question even before the compensation is determined and tendered to the rightful claimants. Such application shall be disposed of by the Collector in accordance with law. If the Collector grants the sanction M/s. J. K. White Cement Works shall be free to commence operation of mining activities on the concerned land without even waiting for determination and tendering of the compensation in accordance with the order passed by the Collector in this behalf Even in case the sanction is not granted, the Collector shall proceed to determine the compensation under Sub-section (4) of Section 89 of the Act and if award is not accepted may refer the matter to the Civil Court expeditiously.

Judgment

V.S. Kokje, ACJ.-All these appeals arise out of a common order and arise out of the same suit and, therefore, they were heard together and are being decided together.

2. Theland in question earlier belonged to one Shri Munir Khan who was original holder of the land. He died in the year 1940. His nephews Fajlu Khan and Hafij Khan succeeded to the estate according to one party and according to the other party only Hafij Khan succeeded to the estate of Munir Khan. M/s. J. K. White Cement Works purchased the land in question from sons of Hafij Khan alone. When they tried to enter possession, successors of Fajlu Khan objected and filed the suit and prayed for temporary injunction therein for protecting their possession. Daughters of Hafij Khan were also impleaded in this suit. On 12-2-96 a temporary injunction was issued at the instance of the successors of Fajlu Khan as well as three daughters of Hafij Khan. Four appeals were filed against the injunction order, all of them were dismissed. The matter went to the Board of Revenue in its revisional jurisdiction and the Board of Revenue partly allowed the revision applications and vacated the injunction and instead asked for a security to the tune of Rs. 50,00,000/-from J.

K. White Cement Works. Against this decision of the Board of Revenue three writ petitions were filed before the learned single Judge, two by J. K. White Cement Works and third by Smt. Hasmat Tara & Ors.. The learned single Judge set aside the orders of the Board of Revenue as well as of the Sub-Divisional Officer and directed that M/s. J. K. White Cement should approach the Collector for determination of compensation under Sub-section (4) of Section 89 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 and the Collector shall determine the compensation for infringement of right of occupation and disturbance of the successors of the lands in accordance with the provisions of Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 and on determination of the compensation M/s. J. K. White Cement Works shall furnish solvent security and surety for the like amount to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Chittorgarh before whom the suit was pending and thereafter the Company shall be entitled to excavate minerals from the land in question. Against this order these three appeals have been filed before this Court.

3. Having heard the learned Counsel for both the sides we find that the question involved in the case is a short one. In view of the provisions of Section 89 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 there can be no case for issue of a temporary injunction against excavation of minerals from a revenue paying land under a licence granted by the State Govt. Section 89 declares that the right to all mines, minerals and quarries shall vest in the State Govt. and the State Govt. shall have all powers necessary for the enjoyment of such a right. Section 89 regulates the right to exploit the miners by the assignee of the State Govt. and also provides safeguards for assuring payment of compensation to the holders of the land. Section 89 is reproduced hereunder:-

“Section 89: Right to minerals, mines, quarries and fisheries-The right to all minerals, mines and quarries and to all fisheries, navigation and irrigation in and from, a river shall vest in the State Government and the State Government shall, have all powers necessary for the enjoyment of such a right

(2) Theright to all mines and quarries includes the right of access to land for the purpose of mining and quarrying and the right to occupy such other land as may be necessary for purposes subsidiary thereto, including the erection of offices, workmen’s dwellings and machinery, the staking of minerals and deposit of refuse, the construction of roads, railways or tram lines, and any other purposes which the State Govt. may declare to the subsidiary to mining and quarrying.

(3) If the State Govt. has assigned to any person its right over any minerals, mines or quarries, and if for the proper enjoyme










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top