SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Raj) 150

R.R.YADAV
Urban Improvement Trust – Appellant
Versus
Poonam Chand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Dinesh Maheshwari, for the Appellant
R.K. Thanvi, for the Respondents

Judgment

R.R. Yadav, J.-This is defendants’ second appeal filed by the Urban Improvement Trust, Jodhpur as well as Tehsildar, Urban Improvement Trust, Jodhpur against the Judgment and decree dated 8-12-1995 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, No. 3, Jodhpur in Civil Appeal No. 24 of 1994 whereby he refused to condone the delay under Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act and dismissed the appeal on the ground of limitation.

2. Brief facts necessary for disposal of the instant second appeal are that plaintiff-respondent Poonam Chand filed a Civil Suit No. 13 8/94 for permanent injunction over the disputed land measuring 6825 Square Yards situated in city of Jodhpur. The aforesaid suit was decreed by the learned trial Court on 12-9-94 but as the Counsel engaged on behalf of the defendant-appellants did not inform about the Judgment and decree dated 12-9-94 passed by the learned trial Court, therefore, an appeal could not be filed by the defendant-appellants within limitation.

3. After getting information about the Judgment and decree dated 12-9-94, the defendant-appellants applied for certified copies of Judgment and decree of the learned trial Court with promptitude and

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top