SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Raj) 426

AMARESH KUNWAR SINGH
Dhan Raj – Appellant
Versus
Kishni – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vijay Agarwal, for the Appellant
M.K. Garg, for the Respondents

Judgment

Amaresh Kunwar Singh, J.-Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the non-Petitioner No. 1.

2. The non-Petitioner No. 1 Smt. Kishni is the wife of the petitioner Dhanraj. She filed an application under Section 125, CrPC for grant of maintenance allowance to her. That application was disposed of vide order dated 25th September, 1975 by the learned Additional Munsif and Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Sri Ganganagar. Maintenance allowance to the tune of Rs. 50/-per month was granted to the non-Petitioner No. 1. A revision petition was filed before the Court of Session and the learned District Judge, Sri Ganganagar enhanced the maintenance allowance to Rs. 70/-per month. On 27th January, 1987 Smt. Kishni-non-Petitioner No. 1 submitted an application under Section 127, CrPC for enhancement of maintenance allowance. That application was allowed and the maintenance allowance was enhanced to Rs. 100/-per month. On 17th February, 1992 Smt. Kishni non-Petitioner No. I submitted another application under Section 127, CrPC for further enhancement of maintenance allowance. That application was contested by the petitioner. After hearing both the parties, the learned Additional Munsi









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top