SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Raj) 356

AMARESH KUNWAR SINGH
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Amit – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.S. Bhati, Public Prosecutor, for the Appellant
D.K. Parihar, for the Respondents

Judgment

Amaresh Kunwar Singh, J.-Heard the learned public prosecutor and the learned counsel for the appellant.

2. The State has filed this appeal against the Judgment delivered by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jodhpur on 23rd February, 1987 acquitting the respondents Amit and Jai Singh of the offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The facts of the case may be briefly stated as below:-Mahendra Singh was in the employment of Seth Durga Prasad Sabu who was living in House No. 16/A Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur. According to the prosecution a Honda generator was stolen from the above mentioned house of Seth Durga Prasad Sabu. The first information report about the alleged theft was lodged at the Police Station on 18th June, 1985. In that report it was stated that sometime ago a Honda generator of red colour had been stolen from House No. 16/A, Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur. On the basis of the first information report submitted by Mahendra Singh, the Police registered the case and started investigation. Respondent Amit was arrested by the Police. He was interrogated and during interrogation, on 17th June, 1985 he gave information to the Poli





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top