SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Raj) 744

M.A.A.KHAN
Radhey Shyam – Appellant
Versus
Meera Devi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.K. Joshi, Sanjay Joshi and Anita Bhargav, for the Appellant
Akhil Modi, for the Respondents

Judgment

M.A.A. Khan, J.-Since, both these Revision Petitions Under Section 397, CrPC arise out of the same order of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge dated April 9, 1992 passed Under Section 397, CrPC whereby the learned Addl. Sessions Judge reversed the order passed by the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishangarh Bas, Alwar, in Criminal Case No. 65/1990 dismissing respondents application Under Section 125, CrPC for grant of maintenance to them, these were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The main order shall be placed on the file of S.B. Cr. Revision Petition No. 100/92 Radhey Shyam vs. Smt. Meera Devi & Anr., and a copy thereof shall be placed on the file of the other petition.

2. Respondent Smt. Meera Devi and her minor son Satyanarain had filed an application Under Section 125, CrPC in the Court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishangarh Bas, Alwar on 12.1990 alleging herein that Smt. Meera Devi was married to Shri Ram Avtar petitioner on 10.9.1978 according to the tenets of Hindu religion, that the wedlock produced a male issue, Satyanarain Respondent No. 2 for them but after the birth of Satyanarain the relations between the husban
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top