B.R. Arora, J.-This appeal is directed against the Judgment dated 22-10-94, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ratangarh, by which the learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted the accused-appellants for the offences under Sections 307/34, 341 and 504, I.P.C. and sentenced each of them to undergo imprisonment for life for the offence under Section 307/34, I.P.C. one month’s simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 500/ - and in default of payment of fine further to undergo one month’s .simple imprisonment for the offence under Section 341, I.P.C. and six months’ simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 500/-and in default of payment of fine further to undergo one month’s simple imprisonment for the offence under Section 504, I.P.C.

2. Accused-appellants Pawan Kumar, Mukesh and Megh Raj were tried by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ratangarh, for the offences under Sections 307, 323, 341 and 504 read with Section 34, I.P.C. The case of the prosecution is that on 27-8-91, at about 11.30 p.m., P.W. 1 Chananiya - a worker working in a liquor shop was going to his house. In Mohalla Momasar Bas, accused Pawan Kumar, Mukesh, Megh Raj and one Vinod were sitting. They were