SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Raj) 303

RAJENDRA SAXENA
Deepak Kumar Goyal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K. Singhal and G.R. Goyal, for the Appellant

Judgment

Rajendra Saxena, J.-Petitioner Deepak Kumar Goyal aggrieved by the order dated 14.1995 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Sri Ganganagar cancelling his bail under Section 439 (2) Cr.P.C and directing him to surrender himself before the learned A.C.J.M. on 18.4.1995 and further directing the said Magistrate to send him to the judicial custody, has preferred this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. bearing S.B. Cr. Misc. Application No. 202/95 and anticipatory bail application Under Section 438 Cr.P.C. bearing S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No. 699/95.

2. Sinceboth these petitions emanate from the impugned order, those are being disposed off by a common order.

3. Now briefly the skeletal facts. Deceased Saroj Bala was married on 7.5.1994 to the petitioner and she died on the night intervening 1st and 2nd December, 1995 at petitioner’s house in abnormal circumstances. Initially, an enquiry Under Section 176 Cr.P.C. was conducted by the City Magistrate, Sri Ganganagar. The Medical Board consisting of three doctors conducted the post mortem examination of the deceased and found black points at nostrils and upper lip and one abrasion 1-1/5” x 1/4” x 1/5” on the right side of








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top