SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Raj) 587

High Court Of Rajasthan
Judgename : Mohini Kapoor
Anjana - Appellant
Versus
Mangal Singh - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1233 of 1995
Decided On : 11/08/1995

Advocates Appeared:
Mukesh Kumar, for the Appellant

Interim compensation under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act is only applicable in cases of permanent disablement as defined under Section 142.

Headnote:

Section 140 - Motor Vehicles Act - Applicability of interim compensation only in cases of death and permanent disablement

Fact of the Case:

The injured claimant sought interim compensation under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, claiming permanent disablement due to an accident. The doctor's certificate indicated injuries but did not specify whether the disablement was permanent or temporary.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that interim compensation can only be allowed in cases of permanent disablement as defined under Section 142 of the Motor Vehicles Act. Since the injuries did not fall within the specified clauses of permanent disablement, the application for interim compensation was rightly refused.

Issues: Interim compensation under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, definition of permanent disablement under Section 142

Ratio Decidendi: Interim compensation is only applicable in cases of permanent disablement as defined under Section 142 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

Final Decision: The revision petition seeking interim compensation was dismissed by the court.

Judgment

Mohini kapoor, J.-Parliament in its wisdom has confined the applicability of Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to only those cases where the death and permanent disablement of any person is resulted from an accident. The interim compensation on the ground of’ no fault liability’ has not been allowed in case of accident where disablement is temporary. Where the disablement is temporary, the injured person will be entitled to compensation after the whole matter is inquired into. At the time of moving an application under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act the injured claimant has to satisfy that on account of the accident, he or she has been permanently disabled. In the present case, the certificate given by the doctor is as under: I certify that I have this day 29.6.1995 examined Anjana, 5 years, who states that she was accidentally injured on 111.1994 and was admitted into this hospital and discharged on.. and treated in O.P.D. at...from 111.1994 to till.

M.I. 11/2 cm. x 1 cm. scar (F) forearm.

In my opinion the injury and injuries which she has suffered by reason of the accident involve:

(a) permanent privation of the sight of either eye or the hearing of either ear, or privation of any member or joint;

(b) destruction or permanent impairing of the powers of any member or joint;

(c) permanent disfiguration of the head or face. She sustained fracture of upper 1/3rd shaft of femur left side. She is having limping and wasting of muscles. Disability about 10 per cent (ten).

Sdl Junior Specialist

2. A five years old girl has sustained fracture of upper 1/3rd shaft of femur left side but there is no mention in the certificate whether the disablement is permanent or temporary.

3. Section 142 of the Motor Vehicles Act provides as to what is the permanent disablement. In this section the injuries suffered as a result of accident are as mentioned in the clauses (a),(b) and (c), which have been scored out in the certificate, amount to permanent disablement.

4. When in the opinion of the doctor who gave the certificate, the injuries of the applicant do not fall within clauses (a),(b),(c) of Section 142 of the Motor Vehicles Act, then at this stage it cannot be said that the applicant has suffered permanent disablement so as to get interim compensation on basis of ‘no fault liability’.

5. TheClaims Tribunal has examined this situation in order to refuse interim compensation on the ground of ‘no fault liability’. A reading of Section 140 along with Section 142 of the Motor Vehicles Act makes it clear that interim compensation can be allowed only on basis of permanent disablement and permanent disablement for this purpose is defined under Section 142 of the Act and at present it cannot be said that the case of the applicant is covered by permanent disablement provided under Section 142 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The application for grant of interim compensation has been rightly refised. There is no force in this revision petition and it is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top