High Court Of Rajasthan
Judgename : N.L. Tibrewal
Nathu - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 1560 of 1993
Decided On : 09/20/1994
COGNIZANCE OF OFFENCE - TAKING COGNIZANCE - SECTION 156(3) - SECTION 190 - SECTION 200 - SECTION 202 - MAGISTRATE'S POWER TO FORWARD COMPLAINT FOR INVESTIGATION - STAGE OF FORWARDING COMPLAINT - INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION.
Fact of the Case:
A complaint was filed before a Magistrate alleging commission of offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. The Magistrate, after obtaining a report from the office confirming the complaint's triability and jurisdiction, registered the case and ordered recording of the complainant's statement under Section 200 CrPC. Subsequently, the Magistrate forwarded the complaint to the police for investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC. The petitioner challenged this order, arguing that the Magistrate had already taken cognizance of the offence and therefore could not exercise the power under Section 156(3) CrPC.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the Magistrate had taken cognizance of the offence on the date when the complaint was registered and an order was passed to proceed under Section 200 CrPC. Consequently, the subsequent order forwarding the complaint under Section 156(3) CrPC was without jurisdiction and unsustainable in law.
Issues: 1. Whether the Magistrate had taken cognizance of the offence prior to passing the order under Section 156(3) CrPC? 2. Whether the Magistrate could exercise the power under Section 156(3) CrPC after taking cognizance of the offence?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court interpreted the expression "taking cognizance of an offence" under Section 190 CrPC as the application of mind by the Magistrate for the purpose of proceeding under Section 200 and succeeding Sections in Chapter XV of the Code. 2. The Court held that the power under Section 156(3) CrPC can be exercised by the Magistrate before taking cognizance under Section 190(1)(a) CrPC, but once cognizance is taken and the procedure under Chapter XV is embarked upon, the Magistrate cannot switch back to the pre-cognizance stage by forwarding the case under Section 156(3) CrPC.
Final Decision: The Court allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order forwarding the complaint under Section 156(3) CrPC, and quashed the consequential registration of the FIR. The Magistrate was directed to proceed with the complaint in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XV of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
N.L. Tibrewal, J.-Two short, but, important questions of law are involved in this petition. The questions are:
(i) When Magistrate can be said to have taken the cognizance?
(ii) Whether after taking cognizance of a cognizable offence, the power under Section 156 (3), CrPC can be invoked by the Magistrate. In other words, at what stage a complaint can be forwarded to the concerned police station for an investigation in exercise of powers under Section 156(3)?
2. The above questions have arisen in the following circumstances: Non-petitioner No. 2 herein, made a complaint on July 14, 1993 before the Court of Additional Munsiff and Judicial Magistrate, No. 6, Jaipur City against the petitioner and other co-accused persons alleging that the petitioner and other accused-persons came to his shop to purchase a tractor was sold to them after demonstration and trial and delivery was handed over on the assurance that the price shall be paid on the sanction of the loan from Aravali Land Development Bank, where they have applied for grant of loan. According to the complainant right from (he very beginning, the accused had no intention to pay the price of the tractor and on a false representation they deceived him and as such committed offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC.
3. On receipt of the complaint, the learned Magistrate obtained a report from the office. The office reported on 15-7-93 that the complaint was triable and was within territorial jurisdiction of the Court. Thereafter, the learned Magistrate passed the following order: (English Translation) “15-7-93 -Complainant along with his Counsel present. Office report perused. The complaint is of the jurisdiction of the Court. It may be registered for recording the statement of the complainant. The case be listed on 29-7-93. Sdl Additional Munsiff Judicial Magistrate. No. 6. Jaipur City”
4. Thereafter, on 29-7-93 the learned Magistrate forwarded the complaint to the SHO Police Station Adarsh
Nagar Jaipur under Section 156 (3), CrPC for investigation. After receipt of the complaint, Crime FIR No. 160/93 has been registered at police station Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur for offences under Sections 406 and 420, IPC.
5. The petitioner has moved this Court by a petition under Section 482 Cr. P. C of the Criminal PC 1973
(hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’) praying that the order passed by the Magistrate forwarding the
complaint to the police under Section 156(3), CrPC be quashed, as it was illegal and without jurisdiction.
6. Mr. Narendra Jain, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, contended that the learned Magistrate
did not properly appreciate the relevant provisions of the Code. According to the Counsel, the Magistrate
had taken cognizance in the matter on 15-7-93 when the complaint was registered after perusal and next date
was fixed for recording the evidence of the complainant. It was also contended by the learned Counsel that
the power under Section 156(3), CrPC could be exercised only before the cognizance was taken and not
thereafter, as such, the learned Magistrate acted without jurisdiction in forwarding the complaint to the police
for investigation. It was also submitted that powers conferred on the Magistrate under Section 156(3) of the
Code are independent of his power to send the case for investigation under Section 202 of the Code and that
the power under Section 156(3), CrPC can be involved at a stage when the Magistrate has not taken
cognizance of the case, while Section 202 CrPC comes into operation after the Magistrate starts dealing with
the complaint in accordance with the provisions of Chapter-XV.
7. Section 156(3) of the Code reads as under:
“156(3). Any Magistrate empowered under Section 190 may order such an investigation as abovementioned.”
8. Sections 200 and 202 of the Code are also reproduced, for the sake of convenience, hereunder: -
“200. Examination of complainant- A Magistrate taking cognizance of an offence on complaint shall examine
upon oath the c
Cases Referred : Nirmal Jit Singh Hoon vs. State of West Bengal
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.