SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Raj) 244

R.S.VERMA
Hari Prakash Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Shakuntala Mishra – Respondent


Advocates:
Appearance :
Party-in-Person and Amod Kasiwal, for the Appellant
Party-in-Person and S.P. Tyagi, for the Respondents

Judgment

R.S. Verma, J.-The parties have moved a joint petition today inter alia starting that the parties have been living separately since 8.1980 and it is not possible for them to live together. It is further stated that there are no chances of the parties resuming their marital life. It is further stated that the parties pray for decree for divorce by mutual consent and the same be granted on the following terms and conditions:

(a) That the appellant shall pay to the respondent a sum of Rs. 75,000/-(Rupees seventy five thousand only) as permanent alimony and the said sum shall be in full and final settlement of all rights and obligations arising out of the wedlock, including ‘Stridhan’ etc.;

(b) That the respondent hereafter shall neither make any claim nor shall be entitled to any claim against the appellant;

(c) That the respondent shall hereafter from the month of July, 94, onwards be not entitled to the sum of Rs. 400/-being paid to her as monthly maintenance by the appellant in compliance of the order dated 31.1983 of the Special Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh, passed in proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C;

(d) That the applicant-opposite parties to the appeal undertake to w








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top