SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Raj) 432

N.C.KOCHHAR, M.B.SHARMA
Qamruddin – Appellant
Versus
Rashida – Respondent


Advocates:
Appearance :
Syed Manzoor Ali, for the Appellant

Judgment

M.B. Sharma, J.-We have heard the learned Counsel for the husband-appellant in this misc. appeal arising out of the judgment dated 14.89 of the learned Judge Family Court Jaipur passed on an application Under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code preferred before him by the Respondent Smt. Rashida.

2. In the impugned judgment the learned Judge Family Court has ordered that the appellant shall pay Rs. 150/ -per month to the Respondent from 6.1985 to 111.86. It has also been ordered by the learned Judge Family Court that for the minor daughter the appellant shall pay a sum of Rs. 75/-PM from6.1985 to 111.1986 and thereafter a sum of Rs. 100/-PM till the minor daughter is married or attain majority.

3. It will appear from the aforesaid judgment of the learned Family Court that he came to the conclusion that there was divorce between the parties in accordance with the Muslim Law w.e.f 111.1986 and for that reason he has not awarded any amount of maintenance of the Respondent-wife after that date.

4. In challenge to the aforesaid judgment, the learned Counsel for the appellant has contended that Under Section 125 generally the amount should have been ordered to be paid fro





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top