SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Raj) 26

N.M.KASLIWAL, K.S.SIDHU
Kishanlal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Prem Kishore – Respondent


Advocates:
Appearance :
P.C. Jain, for the Appellant
H.C. Rastogi and J.P. Goyal, for the Respondents

Judgment

K.S. Sidhu, J.-This petition of revision under Section 115 CPC is directed against the appellate order, dated, July 23, 1981, by the Additional District Judge, Jaipur City whereby that learned Judge affirmed the order, dated, December 12, 1980, by the trial Court dismissing the petitioner’s application, dated, April 11, 1980, for provisional determination of arrears of rent payable by the petitioner-tenant to the respondent-landlord, in accordance with the provisions of Section 13 (3), Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950, as amended to date.

2. Thefacts which may be helpful in appreciating the controversy may be briefly recapitulated here. Prem Kishore, who is the respondent in this petition and who will hereinafter be referred to as the plaintiff , filed a suit against Kishanlal Sharma, the present petitioner, who will hereinafter be referred to as the defendant, for eviction from certain residential premises on the averments that the defendant is in occupation of the premises as a tenant since June, 1971, that the original landlord, Mukat Beharilal, sold the premises to the plaintiff , vide sale deed, dated, May 20, 1974, registered on June 17, 19
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top