SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Raj) 371

R.S.CHAUHAN
PRAHLAD – Appellant
Versus
LADDEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
O.P.Jain, Praveen Jain

Judgment

( 1 ) THIS appeal arises out of the judgment dated 31-5-2006 passed by the additional District Judge (Fast Track), No. 4, Tonk whereby the learned Judge has decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff-respondents and has cancelled the sale deed dated 6-5-2003 executed by the defendant no. 1 in favour of the defendant No. 2 and has restrained the defendants from alienating the disputed land by way of permanent injunction. For the sake of brevity, the original defendant Nos. 1 and 2 in the suit, shall be referred to as the appellants and the original plaintiff-respondent Nos. 1 to 8 in the suit, shall be referred to as the respondents.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are that the respondent Nos. 1 to 8 are the legal heirs of late Milap Chand Jain. Mr. Milap Chand jain was having an agriculture land, bearing khasra No. 296/2/2, measuring six bighas and eight biswas, situated at Village mohammedpura, Tehsil Tonk, Mr. Jain executed a power of attorney in favour of the appellant No. 1 on or about 28-5-1997 in regard to the aforementioned land. Admittedly, mr. Jain died on 21-10-1997. However, despite his death on 21-10-1997, the appellant No. 1 executed a sale deed in favour o













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top