SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Raj) 851

GUMAN SINGH, SHIV KUMAR SHARMA
SATISH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Brijesh Sharma, M.L.Goyal, S.R.BAJWA, V.R.BAJWA

Judgment

SHIV KUMAR SHARMA, J.

( 1 ) CHALLENGE in these appeals is to the judgment dated april 18, 2003 of the learned Additional Sessions judge (Fast Track), Kishangarh Bas (Alwar) whereby the appellants were convicted and sentenced as under :-Under Section 302, IPC : both to suffer imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 1000/ -. in default to further suf-fer rigprous imprisonment for three years. Under Section 364, IPC : both to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years and fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default to further suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years. Under Section 201. IPC : both to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years and fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default to further suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year. The substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently. FACTS :

( 2 ) ON May 9, 2000 at 8. 30 a. m. informant umesh Kumar (PW 2) lodged a written report (Ex. P-9) at Police Station Kotkasim to the effect that he was resident of village katopur. On May 8, 2000 he was sleeping along with other family members. Around 11. 30 p. m. he woke up and came out side in the Courtyard. He then found that his son Dilawar alias Kalu, aged 6 years, was missing. He looked aro































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top