SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Raj) 1219

RAGHUVENDRA S.RATHORE
DEEN DAYAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anoop Dhand, JINENDER JAIN, Manoj Gupta, UMESH SHIRING

Judgment

RAGHUVENDRA S. RATHORE, J.

( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner, learned public Prosecutor for the State and the learned counsel for the complainant and also perused the material on record.

( 2 ) THIS is an application for cancellation of bail which was granted by the learned court below on 12th of September 2006. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application of the accused non-petitioner No. 2 was earlier filed before this court and the same was dismissed vide order dated 12th of July 2006. He further submits that despite of rejection of the bail application by this court, the learned Court below has granted bail application to the petitioner by the impugned order. This is only on the ground advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

( 3 ) LEARNED Counsel for the accused respondent No. 2 has submitted that this court while dismissing the bail application of the accused non-petitioner on 12th July 2006, had observed that the petitioner shall be at liberty to file application before the court below after framing of the charge. He further submits that the charge in this case ordered to be framed by the Court below on 1st of Septemb






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top