SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Raj) 67

BAPNA, WANCHOO
NAHAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mansha Ram

Judgment

( 1 ) THIS revision has arisen out of a reference by the Ses. J. of Tonk in a revision before him out of proceedings under Sections 145 and 107, Criminal P. C. When the matter came up before the learned single Judge of this Court, he referred the following three points for decision by a Division Bench:-

(1) "whether a Magistrate was competent to initiate proceedings under Sections 107 and 145 Cr. P. C. simultaneously; (2) In case the Magistrate finds after enquiry under Section 145 cr. P. C. that the property in dispute was in joint possession of the parties then (a) what should be the nature of the order if one would be passed under Section 145 Cr. P. C. or (b) should the Magistrate proceed to pass an order under Section 146 Cr. P. C. , and (3) In case the finding of the Magistrate was under Clause (2) above, and he apprehended a breach of peace between the parties while each attempted to oust the other, was he competent to ask for security to keep the peace under Section 107 Cr. P. C. where (a) the proceedings were initiated under Section 145 and 107 Cr. P. C. and (b) where the proceedings were taken exclusively under Section 145 Cr. P. C.

( 2 ) A brief reference to the f










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top