SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Raj) 164

SHARMA
JANKIBALLABH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.L.AGARWAL, R.K.Rastogi

Judgment


SHARMA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference by the learned Sessions Judge, Jaipur City recommending that the conviction and sentence of Jankivallabh applicant under Section 203 (4) of Jaipur City Municipalities Act by the First Assistant City Magistrate, Jaipur be set aside and he be acquitted.

( 2 ) THE applicant was prosecuted on a report by the Building Inspector, Jaipur city Municipality dated 31st October 1950 that he was running a factory with an electric Motor machine of 11 1/2 H. P. in his house without a license.

( 3 ) IT was not denied by the applicant that he was using an electric motor machine of 11 1/2 H. P. in his house without a license, but he pleaded that he had thereby committed no offence under Section 203 (4 ). The learned First assistant. City Magistrate, Jaipur held that the accused was guilty of the contravention of Section 2 of the Dangerous and Offensive Trade Bye Laws and convicted him under Section 203 (4) of the Jaipur City Municipalities Act 1943 (hereinafter to be referred as the Act) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 30/- only and in default to undergo 15 days simple imprisonment.

( 4 ) AGAINST this order a revision was filed in the Court of lea









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top