SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Raj) 136

SHARMA
RAMJIWAN – Appellant
Versus
MADDYE KHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.C.Swami, P.N.DUTT

Judgment

SHARMA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application by Ram Jiwan complainant, to revise the order of the learned Extra Magistrate, Jaipur District discharging the accused opposite party. The complaint was under Section 382 of the Penal Code and alleged that a pair of bullocks which had been purchased by the complainant from Sunder Lal had been forcibly seized from the possession of the complainants son Chajju on the 14th May, 1949.

( 2 ) THE learned Magistrate took proceedings under Section 202 of the Code of criminal Procedure in which Chajju and Ganga Bux were examined. The accused was summoned under Section 427 of the Penal Code. In the presence of the accused, the statements of Ramjiwan complainant, Sunderlal, the seller of the bullocks, Govind Narain his son and Raghunath and Panchya and bhonrilal were recorded. Raghunath and Panchya deposed that it was in their presence that the bullocks were seized by the accused from the possession of chajju and Ganga Bux. Bhonrilal deposed that the bullocks were sold by sunderlal to Ramjiwan and that the witness scribed Khata Ex. P. 1 relating to the entry of the sale of bullocks. Govind Narain also deposed about the sale to the complainant.








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top