SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Raj) 188

SHARMA, RANAWAT
DWARKA PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
GOPI NATH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.Bhargava, Brij Bhushan Lal

Judgment


SHARMA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is one of the defendants appeal and arises out of a suit for redemption, filed by the plaintiff respondents against the defendant appellants in the Court of the Munsiff, Bharatpur.

( 2 ) IT was alleged that certain shops in the town of Bharatpur were mortgaged by Shankerlal, father of the plaintiff No. 1, Gopi Nath, plaintiff No. 2 Bal Kishen, and grandfather of Prem Narain minor, plaintiff No. 3, on the 28th of June 1910 for a consideration of Rs. 500/-in favour of the defendants Chhoteylal, Nand kumar, Badri Prasad and Dwarka Prasad. The rate of interest agreed upon was rs. 1/4/- per cent, per mensem. It was recited in the mortgage deed that the rent of the mortgaged property at the time of the mortgage was Rs. 5/-per mensem. This rent would be credited towards interest. If the rent realized in future exceeded the amount of monthly interest, the excess would be credited towards principal.

( 3 ) THE plaintiffs alleged that Rs. 300/-were paid towards the mortgage money and the rent of the mortgaged property had been in excess of the monthly interest. Therefore, nothing was due to the mortgagees on account of principal and interest of the mortgage. O


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top