SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 2627

R.S.CHAUHAN
HANUMAN MEENA – Appellant
Versus
CHANDRA SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MAHENDRA GOYAL, RAJENDRA PRASAD

Judgment

( 1 ) THE appellant has challenged the judgment dated 11-7-2002 passed by the Additional District Judge, No. 5, Jaipur City, Jaipur whereby the learned judge has quashed and set aside the order dated 28-4-2000 passed by the Additional civil Judge (Junior Division), Jaipur (East) and has remanded the case back to the learned Magistrate.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are that the respondent-plaintiff had filed a civil suit wherein he had claimed that he had purchased a plot. Plot No. 23 situated in Vijay nagar Scheme, J. L. N. Marg, Jaipur from shri Laxmi Narayanpuri Bhawan Nirmal sahkari Samiti Ltd. , Jaipur (henceforth to be referred to as the society, for short ). Since 1981 he is in possession of the said plot. However, after handing over the possession to him, the society tried to reduce the size of his plot and tried to issue an amended allotment letter. The plaintiff cautioned the society against it. It was further claimed that plot Nos. 25 and 26 were bought by the pro forma respondent/defendant no. 1. The defendant No. 1 and her husband in collusion with the society members wanted to encroach upon the plaintiffs plot. Therefore, the suit for declaration to the e
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top