SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 2625

JITENDRA RAY GOYAL
ULFAT RAI ARYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMIR AZIZ, D.K.Jain, H.P.Verma, S.P.TYAGI, SUNIL TYAGI

Judgment

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the judgment dated 24-6-1993 passed by special Judge, CBI Cases, Jaipur whereby the accused appellant was convicted and sentenced as under :- under Section 161. IPC :- Six months rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 100/- in default of payment of fine to further undergo 15 days rigorous imprisonment. Under Section 5 (lkd) read with Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 :- One year rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo two months rigorous imprisonment.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the facts of the case are that the appellant was Sub-Divisional Officer, Telegraph Department, Sikar and was conducting an enquiry against Sh. Tara chand Deothia, Office Assistant, Telegraphs of DET, Sikar who was facing a departmental enquiry under Section 16 of ccs (Conduct) Rules for flouting the orders of his superiors. It is alleged that the appellant on 14/15-2-1985 demanded a bribe of Rs. 200/ - from Sh. Tara Chand Deothia to decide the department enquiry in his favour. During the conversation demand was reduced to Rs. 150/- from Rs. 200/ -. On 19-2-1985 once again the appellant pressed for pa



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top