SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 2354

R.S.CHAUHAN, S.N.JHA
RAM GOPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.S.GILL, PARAS KUHAD

Judgment


R. S. CHAUHAN, J.

( 1 ) SENTINELS of our past, repository of our culture and heritage, forts and palaces dot the hills and desert of rajasthan. One such fort is the fort of chomu, a town situated thirty-three kilometers from jaipur. Scion of the royal family of Jaipur State, the Nathawats started the construction of the fort in the 17th century, and extensively enlarged it in the 18th century. The fort houses a palace complex and the fortress walls ("the Parkota") and a ditch ("the Khai" ). The fort is the bone of contention between the petitioners and the state. Vide Notification dated 28-3-78, published on 8-4-1978 in the Rajasthan Gazette, the State had declared the fort to be a "protected monument" under Section 3 (4a) of the Rajasthan Monuments, Archaeological sites and Antiquities Act, 1961 (henceforth to be referred to as the State Act, for short ). The petitioners are challenging the validity of the said notification. They are also challenging the letter dated 16-9-81, whereby the objections filed by the petitioners against the said notification were rejected by the state.

( 2 ) THIS case has had a checkered history. On 7-12-1972, the petitioners purchased the sai
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top