SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 2198

JITENDRA RAY GOYAL
KAMRUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARTI SHARMA, BHARTI SHARMA, M.L.Goyal, O.P.JHANJHARIA

Judgment


JITENDRA RAY GOYAL, J.

( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for accused petitioners as well as complainant, learned public Prosecutor for the state, perused the case diary and other material produced during the course of arguments.

( 2 ) LEARNED counsel for accused petitioners contended that the accused petitioners have falsely been implicated in this matter with the conspiracy and at the instance of Mehboob Ali Rangrej who is brother of Barkat Bano. It is also submitted that Barkat Bano was sick and the accused petitioners were always taking care of her treatment, she was regularly being treated by the doctor of government dispensary at Khachariwas and thereafter she was brought to Jaipur for treatment. It is also submitted that Sonu is 15 years boy and Shamim is 12 years girl, they have also been implicated just to harass the entire family.

( 3 ) LEARNED public Prosecutor and counsel appearing for the complainant ve-hemently opposed the bail application and contended that the accused petitioners are of criminal background, earlier also they tortured Barkat Bano who is wedded wife of accused petitioner Salim for which FIR was lodged and on the compromise by the accused petitione



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top