SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 1251

PRAKASH TATIA
NIRMAL JAIN – Appellant
Versus
BHILWARA PROCESSOR LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.SARUPARIA, VINAY JAIN

Judgment

( 1 ) AT the request of learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is heard finally. The appellant is aggrieved from the order dated 22. 4. 2004 passed by the Learned Additional District Judge no. 1, Bhilwara in Civil Misc. Case No. 15/2003.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts of the case are that the plaintiff/ respondent filed the suit for recovery of Rs. 1,24,813. 87p. against the defendants no. 1 and 2 firms K. K Agencies and himani Fabrics through its proprietor Nirmal Jain. The plaintiff also impleaded Nirmal Jain as defendant no. 3. The address of the defendants no. 1 and 2 is given as Om Textile tower, Pur Road, Bhilwara whereas the address of the defendant no. 3 is A-48, Shastri Nagar, Bhilwara. Notices were sent to the defendants by the trial court which are received unserved upon which the trial court directed to serve the notices on new addresses of the defendants. The notices were sent by registered post as well as ordinary post. The report on the summons sent by the ordinary post reveals that the process server reported that the said firms are not at the address given in the summons and for defendant no. 3, it was reported that he is not residing at the place given in the sum









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top