GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS
DEVI LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) I have heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned Public Prosecutor for the State as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant and carefully gone through the impugned order.
( 2 ) IT is contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that all other co-accused have already been enlarged on bail and in this case cross FIR has also been filed by the accused-party. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that applicant Jiya Lal received as many as five injuries including injury upon his head and another accused tulsa Ram received three injuries but knowingly that there is injury upon the head of Jiya Lal, the Police has registered the case under Sections 323, 341 and 34 i. P. C. against the complainant party in which the investigation is going on. In the present case, injured Gopi Ram has received two injuries out of which one is upon head and injured Kanshi Ram also received one injury upon head. The injury received by injured Kanshiram was simple in nature but injury received by Gopi Ram was grievous in nature. At present, injured Gopi Ram is physically fit though the case was registered against the applicants under
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.