SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 1328

GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS
DEVI LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK UPADHAYAY, MRIDUL JAIN, V.K.Mathur

Judgment

( 1 ) I have heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned Public Prosecutor for the State as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant and carefully gone through the impugned order.

( 2 ) IT is contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that all other co-accused have already been enlarged on bail and in this case cross FIR has also been filed by the accused-party. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that applicant Jiya Lal received as many as five injuries including injury upon his head and another accused tulsa Ram received three injuries but knowingly that there is injury upon the head of Jiya Lal, the Police has registered the case under Sections 323, 341 and 34 i. P. C. against the complainant party in which the investigation is going on. In the present case, injured Gopi Ram has received two injuries out of which one is upon head and injured Kanshi Ram also received one injury upon head. The injury received by injured Kanshiram was simple in nature but injury received by Gopi Ram was grievous in nature. At present, injured Gopi Ram is physically fit though the case was registered against the applicants under






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top