SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 1387

RAJESH BALIA, R.P.VYAS
TECHNIQUE DIABRASSIVE (INDIA) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CESTAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Dinesh Mehta

Judgment

( 1 ) WE have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Central Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal on application moved by the petitioner for staying the recovery of demand created by the Excise commissioner during the pendency of the appeal. The tribunal after taking into consideration the contention of the assessee that the demand was created by proceeding ex-parte without giving an adequate opportunity and referring the admission made by the company, granted partial relief by directing the petitioner to deposit 15 lacs of such demand and on payment, the further penalty proceedings was stayed.

( 2 ) WE are of the opinion that the order being well reasoned, does not call for any interference. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner on merits of the appeal cannot be entertained at this stage by us, and that is a matter for consideration by tribunal. The petition is hereby dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top