SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 1415

GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS
ABDUL SHAKUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ABDUL LATIF, ASHOK UPADHAYAY, MUNESHWAR KHAN

Judgment

( 1 ) BY this criminal misc. petition under section 482 Cr. P. C. , the petitioner has prayed for quashing of criminal proceedings pending against him in the court of Judicial Magistrate No. 7, Jodhpur in criminal Case No. 1100/2001 for offence under Section 498-A I. P. C.

( 2 ) HEARD learned counsel for the the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that it is a matrimonial dispute between the parties which has resulted into criminal proceedings against the petitioner under Sections 498-A and 323 IPC pending before the trial court. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that compromise has arrived at in between the parties and now there is no dispute in between them. He further states that both the parties have submitted the compromise before the learned court below and prayed that criminal proceedings pending against the petitioner be dropped. However, learned trial court has accepted the compromise as far as it relates to offence under Section 323 I. P. C. and refused to attest the compromise as far as it relates to offence under Section 406 I. P. C. He






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top