SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 1487

High Court Of Rajasthan
Judgename : R.C.GANDHI
RAJA RAM - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Respondent
S. B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION 1599 Of 2003
Decided On : 05/16/2006

Advocates Appeared:
BHEEM ARORA, R.R.KANVAR

The main legal principle established is that the definition of family under Rule 66 of the Rajasthan Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants Rules, 1975 prioritizes the appointment of the deceased male servant's wife over other family members for compassionate appointment.

Headnote:

Compassionate Appointment - Definition of Family - The court dismissed the petitioner's claim for compassionate appointment based on the interpretation of Rule 66 of the Rajasthan Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants Rules, 1975, which defines the family of a deceased government servant and prioritizes the appointment of the wife over the son.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought compassionate appointment after the demise of his father, who was a government servant. The respondent had already appointed the petitioner's mother on compassionate grounds, and the petitioner sought appointment after attaining the age of majority.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the petitioner and his counsel. The respondent had already appointed the petitioner's mother in compliance with the provisions of law.

Issues: The main issue was the petitioner's claim for compassionate appointment after the appointment of his mother, based on the definition of family under Rule 66 of the Rajasthan Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants Rules, 1975.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of Rule 66, which prioritizes the appointment of the deceased male servant's wife over other family members, including the son.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed in default of appearance by the petitioner or his counsel.

Judgment

( 1 ) THE petitioner seeks compassionate appointment to the post of naka Guard/safi Karmchari in the Nagarpalika Mandal, Nagaur on the demise of his father on 19. 11. 1975, during service. Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that on the death of father of the petitioner Sh. Pukhraj, his widow was appointed on compassionate ground vide order dated 30. 1. 1986. The petitioner after attaining the age of majority seeks compassionate appointment.

( 2 ) RULE 66 of the Rajasthan Recruitment of Dependants of Government servants Rules, 1975 deals with the definition of family. In the first category, the respondents are to take into consideration the wife in case of deceased male servant and the son is in third category. The respondents have considered the wife and appointed her and complied the provisions of law. Neither the petitioner nor his counsel is present. The petition is dismissed in default of appearance.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top