SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 1578

H.R.PANWAR
VED BAJAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.P.S.CHAUDHARY

Judgment

( 1 ) NO one appears for the petitioner. Perused the order impugned dated 25-2-2006 passed by the Judicial Magistrate No. 7, Jodhpur (for short, "the trial court" hereinafter) in F. R. No. 88/2004, whereby the trial Court accepted the negative final report submitted by the petitioner.

( 2 ) ON the report lodged by the petitioner, the matter was thoroughly investigated by the police and the police came to the conclusion that prima facie no offences under Sections 420, 406 and 120-B IPC are made out from the material on record. A protest petition was filed by the petitioner and the petitoiner himself appeared as PW 1 and produced his wife Anita Bajaj as pw 2.

( 3 ) THE case as set up by the petitioner is that by paying a sum of Rs. 500/- in cash andrs. 3600/- by cheques to the nonpetitioners, he became a member of the Club of the nonpetitioners. The terms and conditions of the Membership were that the Club will provide them facilities of Five Stars Hotel and if any of the member does not wish to avail the said facilities, he will be paid a sum of Rs. 4200/- per year. Neither during investigation nor in support of the protest petition, petitioner produced any document showin


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top