SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 1560

High Court Of Rajasthan
Judgename : H.R.PANWAR
INDRAJ - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Respondent
Cr. Misc. III Bail App 1909 Of 2006
Decided On : 05/19/2006

Advocates Appeared:
J.P.S.Choudhary, M.K.GARG

Granting bail based on the facts and circumstances without commenting on the merit of the case to avoid prejudice.

Headnote:

Bail Application - Prosecutrix Statement - The court allowed the third bail application after considering the statement of the prosecutrix and the documents, and without commenting on the merit of the case, granted bail based on the facts and circumstances.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a third bail application after the statement of the prosecutrix was recorded by the trial court. The prosecutrix admitted that certain letters bear her handwriting.

Finding of the Court:

The court, after considering the statement of the prosecutrix and the documents, and without commenting on the merit of the case, granted bail to the accused petitioner.

Issues: The main issue was whether the accused petitioner should be granted bail based on the statement of the prosecutrix and the documents presented.

Ratio Decidendi: The court decided to grant bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merit of the case to avoid prejudicing either party at the trial.

Final Decision: The third bail application filed under Sec. 439 cr. P. C. was allowed, and the accused petitioner was directed to be released on bail upon fulfilling certain conditions.

Judgment

( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public prosecutor for the State. This is third bail application. While rejecting the earlier bail application, the petitioner was granted liberty to file a fresh bail application after the statement of prosecutrix is recorded by the trial court.

( 2 ) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner has placed on record the statement of prosecutrix PW-2. I have carefully gone through the statement of prosecutrix PW-2 as also the documents Ex. D-1 to D-11, letters said to have been written by the prosecutrix. The prosecutrix, in her statement, admitted that the letters bear her handwriting. Be that as it may, without commenting on the merit of the case which may prejudice the case of either party at the trial, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the oral arguments advanced by the counsel for parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail.

( 3 ) ACCORDINGLY, this third bail application filed under Sec. 439 cr. P. C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Indraj S/o Mani Ram be released on bail in FIR No. 184/05 P. S. Sangeria, district hanumangarh, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top