SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 1588

RAJESH BALIA, R.P.VYAS
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
HINDUSTAN ZINC LTD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vineet Kumar Mathur

Judgment

( 1 ) THE revenue through this appeal against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate tribunal requires this appeal to be admitted for deciding the following question as substantial question of law :-Whether the learned Tribunal is right in law in allowing the modvat credit on the item ms/ss plates in the maintenance and repair work of the machinery.

( 2 ) HOWEVER, it is brought to our notice that like question about the admissibility of the modvat credit on the various items used in workshop meant for repair and maintenance the machinery, which are used for manufacture of final product, considering them as capital goods in respect of which modvat credit is available came for the consideration before this Court in D. B. Civil Central Excise Appeal No. 05/2005 The Union of India Vs. M/s Aditya Cement and anr. decided on 8. 11. 2005.

( 3 ) THIS court concluded that goods once brought in factory for use in up-keep and maintenance of plant and machinery, which are directly used in manufacture of excisable articles, are the capital goods, and were certainly of subordinate necessity to such plant and machinery for the running of plant and is otherwise essenti



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top