SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 1610

H.R.PANWAR
HARISH CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.P.S.CHAUDHARY, Talat Bari

Judgment

( 1 ) BY the instant criminal revision under Section 397 read with section 401 Cr. P. C. , petitioner has challenged the order dated 18. 10. 2005 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (First class), Badi Sadri camp Mandfia (in short trial court) in criminal complaint case No. 42/2003, whereby the trial court dismissed the complaint filed the petitioner.

( 2 ) I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned public Prosecutor and perused the order impugned. It appears that the petitioner has been arrested by the Police for offense punishable under the NDPS Act as he was found in possession of one and half Kg smack (Heroin) in contravention of the provisions of NDPS Act which is punishable under Section 8/21 of the said Act. It appears that in defence the petitioner has set up a story that while at the petrol pump he was kidnapped in a car and thereafter a case has been instituted against him. The trial court on considering the evidence prima facie came to the conclusion that no such occurrence has took place. The petitioner was found in possession of contraband smack (Heroin) of one and half Kg which is a commercial quantity punishable under Sect


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top