H.R.PANWAR
MUSTAQ ALI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
( 1 ) BY an application being S. B. Criminal Misc. Application no. 305/06, the petitioner seeks to implead Ikramudeen and mohd. Sabir as petitioners No. 2 and 3 in the instant revision petition.
( 2 ) FOR the reasons mentioned in the application, the application is allowed. Amended cause title has been filed, the same be placed at appropriate place in the file.
( 3 ) WITH the consent of learned counsel for the petitioners, public prosecutor and counsel appearing for the complainant, the revision petition itself is finally heard and being decided at the admission stage.
( 4 ) BY the instant criminal revision petition under Section 397 Cr. P. C. , the accused petitioners have challenged the order dated 12. 4. 2006 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (Fast track) No. 1, Jodhpur (for short the trial court hereinafter) in sessions Case No. 27/2006, whereby the trial court framed the charges against the petitioners No. 1 Mushtaq and No. 2 Mohd. Sabir for the offences under Sections 341, 324 and 307 IPC and against petitioner No. 3 Ikramudeen for the offences under sections 341, 324/34 and 307/34 IPC. Aggrieved by the order impugned, the petitioners have filed the instant revis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.