SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 1759

DINESH MAHESHWARI
RAJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.S.SINGHVI, RAMESHWAR CHOUHAN

Judgment

( 1 ) CHALLENGING the proceedings for cancellation of his retail outlet dealership, the petitioner has submitted this writ petition seeking the following reliefs:-I. by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the order of cancellation of dealership of the petitioner may be placed on the record and the same may be declared illegal and be quashed with all consequential directions and the respondents may kindly be restrained from granting dealership to any other person. II. by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the impugned notices dated 6. 12. 2005 (Annexure-7) and 14. 2. 2006 (Annexure-9)respectively be declared illegal and be quashed and the respondents may kindly be restrained from taking any action for canceling the dealership of the petitioner pursuant to the impugned notices with all consequential directions. III. by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may be directed to act upon the letter of appointment of the petitioner as dealer of the respondent Corporation and to hand over the possession of petrol pump in question for the purpose of running it. IV. by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondent Indian Oil Corporation may be







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top