( 1 ) BOTH these petitions are filed by the petitioner under Section 482, Cr. P. C. challenging order dated 5-9-2005 (in S. B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 1223/2005)whereby the trial Court has framed charge against the petitioner for offence under Section 3/25, Arms Act and order dated 11-7-2005 (in S. B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 1224/2005) whereby the trial Court rejected the petitioners application moved under section 311, Cr. P. C. for recalling witness jaipal, P. W. 6 for cross-examination. Both the impugned orders are passed in Sessions case No. 2/2005, arising out of C/r. No. 412/2004, P. S. Raisinghnagar registered for offence under Section 341/302, I. P. C. The decision on S. B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 1224/2005 will dispose of both these petitions and, therefore, I gather the facts from petition No. 1224/2005.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case indicate that the case was fixed before the trial Court on 25-4-2005 for prosecution evidence and, on that day, Shri Devendra Singh Ramana, advocate filed vakalatnama of the petitioner. On that date, the prosecution examined its witness Jaipal, P. W. 6 and the witness was also cross-examined by the counsel for the accused p