SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Raj) 562

High Court Of Rajasthan
Judgename : F.C.Bansal
SUBHASH KEER - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Respondent
Cr. Misc. Bail Appl. 2085 Of 2004
Decided On : 06/02/2004

Advocates Appeared:
G.S.Rathore, Praveen Balwada

Headnote:Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 439 — Bail — Out of 11 accused earlier charge-sheeted, four were acquitted and seven convicted u/s. 302/149 IPC — Sentence awarded to convicted accused had been suspended — Fatal injuries were not attributed to petitioner — Petitioner deserved to be admitted to bail. (Paras 2 and 4)

       Result: Application allowed.

       

Judgment


F. C. BANSAL, J.

( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and have also perused the case diary and material on record.

( 2 ) LEARNED counsel for the applicant contended that fatal injuries have not been attributed to the petitioner. Charge sheet was earlier filed against 11 co-accused out of which four have been acquitted and seven have been convicted for offence u/s. 302/149, IPC. The sentence awarded to these seven convicts has been suspended by the Division Bench of this Court vide order dt. 9/5/ 2003 in D. B. Cr. App. No. 466/03. Therefore, this bail application be allowed.

( 3 ) THE learned Public Prosecutor has opposed this bail application.

( 4 ) CONSIDERING the aforesaid submissions and after perusal of the evidence collected during investigation and statements of all the witnesses recorded during the trial against co-accused persons and judgment of the trial court dated 12/3/2003 and the order dt. 9/5/2003 passed by Division Bench of this Court, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant u/s. 439, Cr. P. C.

( 5 ) IT is, therefore, ordered that the petitioner Subhas Keer Sb Sohanlal Keer R/o Keeron Ki Dhani. Tehsil Bansoor (Aiwar) be released on bail pro-vided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs. 10,000. 00 (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sound sureties of Rs. 5,000. 00 (five thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation to appear in the Court as and when called upon to do so during pendency of the trial against him in the case arising out of FIR No. 357/97 Ps Bansoor (Alwar ). Application allo wed.



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top