SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Raj) 562

F.C.BANSAL
SUBHASH KEER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.S.Rathore, Praveen Balwada

Judgment


F. C. BANSAL, J.

( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and have also perused the case diary and material on record.

( 2 ) LEARNED counsel for the applicant contended that fatal injuries have not been attributed to the petitioner. Charge sheet was earlier filed against 11 co-accused out of which four have been acquitted and seven have been convicted for offence u/s. 302/149, IPC. The sentence awarded to these seven convicts has been suspended by the Division Bench of this Court vide order dt. 9/5/ 2003 in D. B. Cr. App. No. 466/03. Therefore, this bail application be allowed.

( 3 ) THE learned Public Prosecutor has opposed this bail application.

( 4 ) CONSIDERING the aforesaid submissions and after perusal of the evidence collected during investigation and statements of all the witnesses recorded during the trial against co-accused persons and judgment of the trial court dated 12/3/2003 and the order dt. 9/5/2003 passed by Division Bench of this Court, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant u/s. 439, Cr. P. C.

( 5 ) IT is, therefore, ordered that the petitioner Subhas Keer Sb Sohanlal Keer R/o Keeron Ki Dhani. Tehsil Bansoor (Ai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top