F.C.BANSAL
SUBHASH KEER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
F. C. BANSAL, J.
( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and have also perused the case diary and material on record.
( 2 ) LEARNED counsel for the applicant contended that fatal injuries have not been attributed to the petitioner. Charge sheet was earlier filed against 11 co-accused out of which four have been acquitted and seven have been convicted for offence u/s. 302/149, IPC. The sentence awarded to these seven convicts has been suspended by the Division Bench of this Court vide order dt. 9/5/ 2003 in D. B. Cr. App. No. 466/03. Therefore, this bail application be allowed.
( 3 ) THE learned Public Prosecutor has opposed this bail application.
( 4 ) CONSIDERING the aforesaid submissions and after perusal of the evidence collected during investigation and statements of all the witnesses recorded during the trial against co-accused persons and judgment of the trial court dated 12/3/2003 and the order dt. 9/5/2003 passed by Division Bench of this Court, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant u/s. 439, Cr. P. C.
( 5 ) IT is, therefore, ordered that the petitioner Subhas Keer Sb Sohanlal Keer R/o Keeron Ki Dhani. Tehsil Bansoor (Ai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.