PRAKASH TATIA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner.

( 2 ) THIS is glaring case of harassment of non-petitioners by the petitioner by abusing the process of Court, compelling the non-petitioners to face litigation even after 42 years of obtaining decree for possession by their ancestor.

( 3 ) THE brief facts of the case are that one Ram Chandra, ancestor of private non-petitioners, filed a suit for possession of an agricultural land measuring 18 Biga 9 Biswa of Khasra No. 60 of village Rohi Naurangsehar, Tehsil Sujangarh, Dist. Churu, against the petitioner of this writ petition in the Court of Sub-Divisional Officer, Ratangarh in the year 1957 alleging that the non-petitioner forcibly dispossessed the plaintiff-Ram Chandra, therefore, decree for eviction be passed against the defendant-petitioner-Hari Ram. The suit was registered as Suit No. 111/57 but that was dismissed by the Sub-Divisional Officer (Assistant Collector), Ratangarh, by the judgment and decree dated 30/08/1958. Ram Chandra preferred appeal against the decree dated 30/08/1958 before the Additional Commissioner, Bikaner Division, Bikaner, which was registered as Appeal No. 183/58. The appeal o