RAJESH BALIA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the parties. Admit. Issue notice. Mr. C. S. Kotwani appears for the respondent No. 3. For the purposes of this appeal respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are not necessary to be served as their rights are not affected in any view of the matter Hence their service is dispensed with. : this appeal has come in peculiar circumstances. The respondent No. 1 was an employee of the State in the Public Health and engineering Department at Nohar Division in sri Ganganagar district. While he was working as Beldar, his services were alleged to be terminated on January 7, 1987 unceremoniously which led to raising of an industrial dispute and a reference to Labour Court to examine the validity of alleged termination of service. The award of labour Court dated July 19,1993 resulted in holding the retrenchment to be invalid and direction to reinstate the workman with full back wages.

( 2 ) AGGRIEVED with that award, a writ petition was filed before this Court. The petitioner in the writ petition was described as executive Engineer, PHED, Nohar, District sri Ganganagar. It appears from the order passed in appeal that the learned single Judge was of the