SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 936

S.K.KESHOTE
MAYA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
HARI SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.MANDHANA, S.K.GUPTA

Judgment


S. K. KESHOTE, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition under Section 115 CPC is directed by the plaintiff petitioners against the order dated 16-11-2000 of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), bharatpur in Civil Suit No. 34/1990. Under this order the learned trial Court has granted the application filed by the defendant non-petitioner under Order 9, Rule 7 CPC. Parties hereinafter referred as the plaintiff and defendant.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case in brief are that the suit for permanent injunction was filed by late Laxman Singh, predecessor-in-title of the petitioners against the defendant non-petitioner. The suit was fixed for plaintiffs evidence on 10-5-1999. As on that date both the parties nor their Counsel were present, the suit was dismissed in default. The application filed by the plaintiff under Order 9, Rule 9 of the cpc was granted and the suit was ordered to a restored to its original number.

( 3 ) IT is not in dispute that the notices with copy of this application of the plaintiff was sent to the Counsel of the defendant. That is not sent for personal service upon the defendant. The Counsel had refused to take the notice on the ground that he had left this brief long















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top