SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 788

J.C.VERMA
NARYAN – Appellant
Versus
MADAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.K.GARG, KAMLA JAIN, S.K.GUPTA

Judgment


J. C. VERMA, J.

( 1 ) THE revision petitioner was plaintiff in the suit for specific performance and has come up against the order dated 12-5-1999 passed by the Additional District Judge, Gangapur City whereby the order dated 23-11-1998 passed by the trial Court was confirmed in interim injunction application.

( 2 ) AS per the facts the petitioner plaintiff has filed a suit for specific performance against the respondents in regard to the land khasra No. 1180 measuring 1. 19 Hectors situated in village Gadhi Gopalpura and other land as mentioned in the suit. It was stated that earlier this land was in the Khatedari of one Ram Swaroop and the land was purchased by the present petitioner-plaintiffs on 20-3-1992 from respondent No. 2 Ram Swaroop and were also put in possession. The defendant Madan was also having half share in the land Khasra No. 1180. Even though the agreement is said to have been entered into between the parties. , but sale-deed was not executed for certain reasons and, therefore, suit for specific performance of contract was filed by the present petitioners along with the application for temporary injunction. The defendants had denied the execution of agre















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top