SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 753

SUNIL KUMAR GARG
ASHWINI KUMAR BHARDWAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.D.KALA, V.D.Kalla

Judgment


SUNIL KUMAR GARG, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition has been filed by the accused petitioner against the order dated 25-10-2000 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Chittorgarh in criminal case No. 110/99 by which he framed charges against the petitioner for offence under Sections 40, 49 read with Section 51 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1972 ).

( 2 ) IT arises in the following circumstances: (i) On 7-6-1996 Shri Bhanwar Singh, SHO, Police Station Chanderiya Dist. Chittorgarh lodged a first information report against the accused petitioner alleging to the effect that at the house of accused petitioner situated at C-82, Kumbha Nagar, Chittorgarh, a search was conducted and during search two skins of Panthor were recovered in one white bag and they were seized and the servants who were present at the time of search showed their unawareness and at the time of search, the accused petitioner was not in his house and he was in police custody in another case. (ii) On this report, police registered a case under Section 9/51 of the Act of 1972 and after investigation, police filed challen against the petiti






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top