High Court Of Rajasthan
Judgename : J.C.VERMA
KAMLA - Appellant
Versus
SUKHDEV SINGH - Respondent
S. B. C. M. A. 60 Of 1998
Decided On : 12/07/2001
Compensation - Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal - The court enhanced the compensation awarded by the Tribunal based on the assessment of the deceased's monthly income and dependency, leading to an increase in the total compensation amount.
Fact of the Case:
The claimants, widow, and children of the deceased filed for compensation after the deceased died in a motor accident. The Tribunal initially awarded compensation of Rs. 2,50,400 based on the assessment of the deceased's monthly income and dependency.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Tribunal had not awarded just and proper compensation to the claimants. It assessed the deceased's monthly income and dependency differently, leading to an enhanced compensation of Rs. 3,08,000 instead of Rs. 2,50,400, to be paid by the insurance company within two months.
Issues: Assessment of deceased's monthly income and dependency, adequacy of compensation awarded by the Tribunal.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the assessment of the deceased's monthly income and dependency, which led to the enhancement of the compensation amount.
Final Decision: The court partially allowed the appeal and enhanced the compensation to Rs. 3,08,000 instead of Rs. 2,50,400, to be paid by the insurance company within two months.
VERMA, J.
( 1 ) THIS misc. appeal has been filed by the appellant for the enhancement of compensation against the order dated 4. 3. 1997 passed by the Motor Accidents claims Tribunal, Beawar, District Ajmer in M. A. C. T. Case No. 73 of 1994 whereby compensation of Rs. 2,50,400 has been awarded.
( 2 ) FACTS of the case are that the claim application was filed by the claimants, who are widow and children of deceased faras Ram who died in the accident which had taken place on 27. 3. 1994 between the jeep No. RJ 01-971 and the truck No. PAT 7513. The victim was travelling in the jeep. After framing the required issues the Tribunal has awarded the compensation of Rs. 2,50,400.
( 3 ) IT is the submission of learned counsel for appellants that the wife has stated that her husband was earning Rs. 3,000 per month and whole amount of Rs. 3,000 were being given for maintenance of the house. However, the Tribunal has assessed the monthly income to be Rs. 1,500, out of which the dependency has been assessed as Rs. 1,200 per month and applied the multiplier of 16. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the evidence of appellant remain unrebutted, therefore, the tribunal ought to have believed the statement of the wife that the deceased was earning Rs. 3,000 per month.
( 4 ) AFTER hearing learned counsel for the appellants, in my opinion, the Tribunal has not awarded the just and proper compensation to claimants. It is a fit case where the monthly income of deceased should be assessed as Rs. 2,000 and after deducting rs. 500 for expenses of the deceased the dependency is assessed as Rs. 1,500 per month. Applying the multiplier of 16 the compensation is enhanced to Rs. 1,500 x 12 x 16 = Rs. 2,88,000 along with the amount rs. 20,000 as awarded by the Tribunal on other counts. The compensation is enhanced to Rs. 3,08,000. The amount of compensation shall bear same rate of interest as has been awarded by the Tribunal. The total compensation is enhanced to rs. 3,08,000 instead of Rs. 2,50,400. The amount of the compensation shall be paid by the insurance company within a period of two months, after adjusting the amount already paid. The compensation shall be paid according to the same proportion and direction as directed by Tribunal. With the above observation the misc. appeal is parthly allowed. Appeal partly allowed. .
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.