SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 1167

R.BALIA, HARBANS LAL
NAND RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.C.Mehta, H.S.S.Kharaliya, S.L.JAIN

Judgment

( 1 ) HEARD, learned counsel for the parties. These two appeals arise out of common order passed by learned single Judge on 18-7-2000 deciding S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 923/99, Nand Ram v. State of Raj and S. B. Civil Writ petition No. 920/99. Both the writ petitions were preferred by two independent cultivators of Chak 3 B. H. M. , whose total holdings admeasured 53 bighas, challenging the same order dated 6-11-98 passed by the Superintending Engineer, Irrigation by which he did not confirm the order passed by Divisional Irrigation Officer for supply of water to the petitioner-appellant in each case through outlet situated at stone No. 378 through existing water course in Chak No. 2 B. H. M. (A ).

( 2 ) THE land in question is situated in Chak No. 3 B. H. M. The land was getting its water supply through water course existing in chak 3 B. H. M. from the outlet meant for supply therefor, when the petitioner-appellants made applications for getting water supply for irrigation through the existing water course situated in Chak 2. B. H. M. (A ). The applications wee considered by the Divisional Irrigation Officer in 1991 and he recommended that petitioner-appellants land s




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top